There is a new misfortune in the family of director Puchinyan: the seized housing was sold to government agencies

The second part of the crime script was written for the family of director Puchinyan

At the end of last year, we told the story of an incredible fraud that resembles a detective film script. Ironically, the participants in the real story were the widow of the director of the films “From the Life of the Chief of the Criminal Investigation Department” and “The Secrets of Madame Wong.” Stepan Puchinyan – Emilia Nikolaevna and his son Philip. Unknown people, as the investigation is now establishing, through prolonged machinations, neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) and intimidation, forced the Puchinyans to transfer two apartments to them – all the housing they have. After which the mother and son ended up in a hotel without a livelihood, and then the police took them away from there and they spent several days behind bars. After investigations by law enforcement agencies, the Puchinyans returned to their home in Moscow, and some strange woman managed to move into the apartment in Stupino. Of course, this story continued in several volumes of the criminal case. Both apartments were immediately placed under arrest, which was extended several times. Emilia Nikolaevna and Philip, fortunately, continue to live in their Moscow apartment, although there are also ongoing proceedings regarding it with those who have already acquired it as part of a scheme implemented by scammers.

And a story happened with an apartment in Stupino that, according to common sense, should not have happened at all. Unexpectedly, Emilia Puchinyan found out that her apartment in the Moscow region, with new tenants behind her back, had managed to be sold again, despite the official ban from law enforcement agencies and the court. And also… to government agencies. The director’s son Philip Puchinyan shared the details with MK.

“When we were preparing for the next court hearing, a neighbor called my mother and told her that she had found information on the Internet about transactions with this apartment. Then my mother quickly went to Stupino and went to the agency through which the new owner tried to quickly resell the house, but then did not have time. And there my mother was informed that the apartment had already been sold at auction through an electronic auction held by the Administration of the Stupino urban district of the Moscow region, as a result of which a municipal contract for the sale and purchase of this apartment was concluded. All information on conducting this electronic auction is publicly available on the electronic platform. Moreover, they bought it at a high price of 7 million 567 thousand rubles within the framework of the state program of the Moscow region “Resettlement of citizens from dilapidated housing stock.” At the same time, our house is old, built back in 1936, 3-story, brick, wooden ceilings, no garbage chute, no elevator. The floors in all the rooms of the apartment are sagging and cosmetic repairs cannot fix this.

— That is, one old apartment was purchased for relocation from another old home?

– It turns out so. Moreover, the official website even published a question: could a 1936 apartment with wooden floors participate in such an auction? And there was even an answer from the Administration: “There are no restrictions.” It turns out interesting! By the way, for this money you can buy an apartment in Moscow.

— How exactly did the process of selling your apartment go?

“As it turned out, it was a very cunning scheme.” The new owner, who managed to take possession of our home in the fall, gave a general power of attorney to a certain individual entrepreneur from the Primorsky Territory. A reasonable question arises: how was she able to sell so profitably? And even at electronic auctions?

— How was this possible if your home is now involved in a criminal case and should have been seized?

– So it was imposed. Mom even wrote a statement to the investigative department, where she was informed that on November 2, the Investigative Department received a message from the Office of Rosreestr for the Moscow Region that information about the seizure of an apartment in the city of Stupino was entered into the book of arrests of the Unified State Register of Real Estate . However, for some reason, official extracts from the Unified State Register do not contain data on the state registration of the arrest. Although, in accordance with the law, the arrest can only be lifted by the person who imposed it. But in the same extracts from the Unified State Register of Real Estate, the restriction of rights and encumbrance of the apartment in Stupino in the form of a mortgage are already registered by force of law. The mortgage is by force of law registered simultaneously with the registration of the Municipal Contract, i.e. December 19th. This means that the apartment was also purchased using credit funds. Did the administration buy the apartment with a mortgage, taking out a loan from an individual? This is something new.

— Explain, how is it even possible to buy an apartment from an ordinary person under such a government contract?

— According to the law, certain requirements are imposed on auction participants. In this case, the individual who sells the apartment must be an individual entrepreneur and have the status of a small business entity. However, the owner of the apartment was not an individual entrepreneur and, accordingly, could not be a participant in the auction. Moreover, the seller of this apartment in the auction documentation indicated a completely different person, and during the period of the auction this entrepreneur was not the owner of the apartment and did not yet have the authority to represent the interests of the owner of the apartment. So he could hardly participate in the auction legally. The fact is that the power of attorney for this entrepreneur was issued only on November 16, i.e. after the close of trading on November 13 and after the final protocol was published in the public domain on November 15.

– Did you contact law enforcement agencies after that?

– Certainly. After all, the illegality of the transaction is obvious. On December 19, my mother filed a statement with the police in Stupino, but to date she has not received any response to this statement. From January 19 to 22, she repeatedly contacted the Stupino City Prosecutor’s Office, where she was informed that no arrest had been made against the apartment from Moscow. Then they said that the arrest was registered incorrectly, so it was not taken into account. Then they reported that the Moscow investigator does not have the right to seize an apartment in the Moscow region. Each time there is different information. But we still hope for a positive result, because violations of the law lie on the surface, and it is not clear to us why this case has not yet moved forward.