Wasserman named the main reason for Pugacheva’s renunciation of the peoples of Russia

“Alla has lost the main thing”

Alla Pugacheva has been living abroad for more than two years. And if earlier the Prima Donna tried not to attract attention to herself, now she regularly arranges various kinds of provocations. Either she says that normal people are not going to return to Russia, then she swears at Stas Mikhailov. After the terrorist attack at Crocus, Alla again made everyone talk about herself. Unlike her colleagues, she did not publicly express condolences. And only a week later she stated that grief is not expressed on social networks. The eminent polymath Anatoly Wasserman explained why Pugacheva stopped living with the concerns of the Russian people.

“She herself needed this more – to express words of condolences in order to return again to the people from whom she is now trying to distance herself,” says Anatoly Alexandrovich. “This happens because with age, Pugacheva lost a significant part of the abilities that allowed her to make money from these people. It was precisely because she lost these abilities that she began to treat the people with disdain. Not realizing that by doing this she is hurting herself. Therefore, I think that it would be very useful for her to express sincere words of condolences after the terrorist attack in Crocus.

At the same time, Wasserman believes that there is no need to pay attention to what Pugacheva says. According to the erudite, the former Diva, like her other colleagues, makes loud statements on purpose.

“In general, I think that we attach exaggerated importance to the opinions of artists,” the erudite continues. — The actor’s task, in principle, is to evoke emotions by any means. Its’ his job. Therefore, what artists say for the most part does not reflect their own opinion on a particular issue. This reflects their opinion on how the question can be used to evoke different emotions in as many of the audience as possible. Considering that this is the main task of the actor, and that all the actions of an actor off the stage are naturally subordinated to the habits developed for the stage, I do not think that we need to pay serious attention to what any given actor says and does off the stage. Including Pugachev.