Ukrainian society is involved in the terrorist attack at Crocus: Kyiv caters to non-humans

Each crime is investigated according to one algorithm, the essence and purpose of which is to collect enough evidence both to establish the picture of what happened and to accuse specific individuals of committing a crime. The approach and logic of the average person who has read detective novels, when “he was seen with a knife over his body, which means he is a murderer,” does not work here. The investigation will painstakingly collect evidence, interview witnesses and interrogate suspects, conduct examinations, identify all accomplices, accomplices and the role of each in the crime. And when the investigation finishes its work, it will be possible to talk about the current picture, which is as close as possible to the objective truth.

But now we can judge some alarming facts that are worth paying attention to and taking note of. Let’s start with the fact that the first details about the work of security forces and law enforcement officers appeared not in official sources and registered media, the editors of which are fully responsible before the law, but in anonymous telegram channels. This means that one of the people in uniform provided the telegram businessmen with the coveted insights.

On what basis did these “leaks” occur? I cannot assume that the leadership of law enforcement agencies gave the command to cooperate with resources in the very network that terrorists use for communication. I don’t want to think that one of the officers is leaking operational information, including photos and videos, “for a small bribe.” After all, if for money (and well-promoted channels can pay a lot for an exclusive) secrets are leaked to nameless bloggers, then in the same way leaks can happen into completely different – criminal – hands.

I understand that this is a sensitive topic, and also unpopular – ordinary people are interested in receiving hot news in their usual channels. But the opacity of information flows creates multiple risks, and something needs to be done about it.

The second fact that it’s time to pay attention to is the emergence of a completely new social phenomenon: zombie terrorists. If earlier “voices in the phone” forced people to simply transfer money to scammers, now more and more often zombified people commit crimes. And several incidents during the elections only confirm this danger – young and old people, susceptible to suggestion, carry out the commands of their handlers with weak-willed obedience – like remote-controlled robots.

I cannot know whether the terrorists who committed the monstrous act at Crocus City Hall were ideologically inflated, motivated fanatics or zombies mindlessly obeying anonymous manipulators – the investigation will answer this question. But the phenomenon of zombie terrorists itself needs to be noticed, comprehended and counteracted. This is a very dangerous phenomenon, this is a terrible technology that turns a random person into a criminal. Normal operational work would not reveal this – before the call, there was a quiet, law-abiding grandmother-neighbor, and after the call she goes to buy firecrackers or ingredients for a Molotov cocktail. To exclude such cases, we will have to look for new approaches.

Another problem that, unfortunately, is usually overlooked is the responsibility of business in security matters. Again, this is a question for the investigation as to why the entertainment complex burst into flames. I fully admit that in this particular case, all fire extinguishing, smoke removal and evacuation systems worked without interruption, but the fuel that several people could carry was enough to destroy all barriers to the spread of fire.

And, as the practice of large fires shows – and, unfortunately, they happen in Russia almost every day – most often businesses simply skimp on safety. But it cannot be controlled: the moratorium on inspections has been extended again. As a result, violations are detected after the fire. I really hope that sooner or later the moratorium on inspections will be lifted in terms of the safety of goods, services and production itself.

I won’t talk about the approach to ensuring the security of mass events – neither metal detectors nor the most trained security guards will help against suddenly appearing militants with machine guns. But again, the investigation will have to find out whether all the necessary measures were taken. And the analysis of the terrorist attack will quite possibly serve as the basis for the emergence of new guidelines.

It is quite possible that some little things can significantly increase the security of both objects and people gathered there. For example, anti-ramming devices may appear at the entrances to large entertainment and sports facilities, along with a requirement to search every approaching vehicle. Or maybe travel to crowded places will be prohibited altogether – if people with weapons walked three hundred meters under the camera lenses, there would be time to react.

As for the idea of ​​returning the death penalty as a means of stopping a potential terrorist, everything is not as simple as we would like. Answer yourself the question: will the prospect of death stop a suicide bomber who deliberately tied himself with an explosive belt? Will a zombie terrorist, hypnotized by a professional manipulative brainiac, be stopped? But he will stop someone who commits a crime for money, with the intention of spending it, living, that is, living, yes.

However, the physical destruction of a criminal also means the destruction of the source of information. The Russian law enforcement system knows hundreds of cases where convicts who have served decades in prison gave evidence in prison that allowed them to solve other crimes. The executed criminal, alas, will no longer surrender any accomplices – they will remain free.

But, of course, if public opinion firmly demands the return of the death penalty, then the current moratorium can be lifted – this will require amendments to the Constitution. After all, law is a living matter that changes in accordance with changes in relations in society.

Finally, the problem that causes the greatest concern is the real social bomb in the underbelly of Russia. Without making hasty predictions about the inevitable involvement of the Ukrainian special services in the terrorist attack – this connection will also have to be revealed by the investigation, I will firmly say that Ukrainian society itself is involved in the crime.

I have been observing for a long time how society literally demands that the Kyiv regime commit crimes. After shelling of peaceful Russian cities, Ukrainian public pages are filled with bloodthirsty comments. And after the terrorist attack, the same thing: tens of thousands of joyful emoticons and thousands of comments with warm approval of what happened. And also – jokes, cynical in their playfulness, wishes of death for children, women and the elderly, an expanse of inhuman fantasies. For a normal person, this stream of chthonic, primitive hatred and passion for destruction can be shocking.

I fully understand that not all Ukrainians have gone crazy, but the mainstream is set by loud and aggressive non-humans who demand innocent blood, mass murder, and genocide. And the Kiev regime, like some of its security and intelligence structures, is doing this to please the loudmouths. This is Nazism. And until it is eradicated, we will never live in peace. Denazification will have to be carried out to the end, it is inevitable.

So, the investigation is now doing its job. Believe me, he does it professionally, competently, diligently. I am confident that all those responsible will be identified and punished. It would be nice for us to look a little more broadly at issues that no investigation will resolve. We, society, will have to find approaches to resolving them.