Transgender surrealism: the tumor grows – MK

I follow with trepidation the vicissitudes of the bill banning “sex change”, which, according to State Duma Vice Speaker Pyotr Tolstoy, is meeting with resistance, but the deputies still expect to finish what they started. I really hope so, because in this case, the State Duma will do something really important and far-sighted for once… although even after that, the “sex change” lobbyists will have many opportunities to stall this important and absolutely overdue bill. In any case, Tolstoy does not exaggerate in the slightest when he says that this is a matter of national security. It is so indeed.

The threatening consequences of the introduction of a “transgender transition” into society are extremely diverse – some of them can be traced to the example of Britain, the USA or Canada, where such practices have already gone quite far.

First of all: being introduced into the body of a society mutilated by tolerance, this idea grows like a cancerous tumor. Only 0.3% of Americans over 50 identify themselves as “transgender and non-binary,” according to a study published last month by the Pew think tank in Washington. At the age of 30–49 there are 1.6% of them, and at the age of 18–29 – already 5.1%! Obsessive aggressive propaganda, starting right from school, is bearing fruit.

And this is far from the limit: after all, it is impossible to resist this propaganda by law, you will not be able to defend your beliefs – you will not even be able to protect your own children. Under the new rules of the Crown Prosecution Service in Britain, it will be considered “domestic violence” for the refusal of parents to pay for the “transgender transition” of their child or the refusal to use the names and pronouns arbitrarily chosen by the “transgender” when communicating with him. Also, the feelings of “trances” are hurt if close people refuse to recognize them as people of the opposite sex (men – women, women – men).

“Transgender people” in general are unusually easy to offend. They take offense at their workplaces – like a waitress in a cafe in Southampton, Britain, who yelled at a visitor when she didn’t make out that she was “not a man” and used the wrong pronoun. They are offended at school – and, for example, in Canada, sixteen-year-old Josh Alexander was suspended from school for refusing to use pronouns that they themselves chose for “transgender people” and opposed boys who consider themselves girls to go to the women’s restroom. Additional surrealism to what is happening is added by the fact that it was a Catholic (!) School. “Transgenders” are offended in prisons – when a male rapist who calls himself a woman is not wanted to be taken to a women’s prison. They are also offended in sports if they are trying to forbid them to participate in women’s competitions. Often it is not possible to ban this, and then men who call themselves women, without any hesitation and easily bypass women in swimming or cycling (in North Carolina, “transgender” Austin Killips overtook the nearest pursuer by five minutes). And, of course, they feel terribly offended if they are not allowed to attend women-only feminist events and are not allowed to use the women’s toilet or locker room. Oh, the women’s locker room, the opportunity for exhibitionism and voyeurism legally – this is essential!

When we are told that a ban on “sex change” will restrict someone’s freedom, we should instantly understand that what we are actually being told is this: you will have to give up the lion’s share of your own freedoms, your usual life, in order to give it to “transgender people” .

And you will be unprotected. The school teacher will be able to call you and tell you that your child has “transitioned” or “chosen a new identity” and now you must – you must, otherwise you will attract the attention of social services! call it by another name, another pronoun. Even school documents when registering a child – for example, for going on an excursion – will already be of the “other sex”. This is actually happening now in Britain, where 39% of secondary school teachers said they would support a child’s “transgender transition” even without parental consent. Here, too, teachers tell the children—the most vulnerable, who don’t make friends at school and who happen to be bullied by classmates—that if they “change gender” it will help them make friends and get rid of bullying. These children with a fragile, mobile psyche, suffering from loneliness and fear of inferiority, children who have increased during the years of covid mental pumping, are the target audience for which the propaganda of “sex change” is addressed, and the lessons of “sex education” have become an ideal opportunity for this.

In June, Britain’s biggest newspaper, the Daily Mail, published educational materials for British teachers explaining how to teach children masturbation at nine and anal sex at twelve. Stories about “non-binary persons” and the possibility of “changing sex”, about the fact that not only women can give birth, and not only men have a penis, are scattered throughout the course. These classes (called Relationships and Sex Education) have been made mandatory since September 2020. Teaching materials are recommended to fifty thousand teachers who teach 600,000 children every year.

The freedom of “transgenders” restricts your freedom in many ways, pervasively. In the same Britain, patients do not have the right to be interested in whether their doctor is “transgender” or not. And they have no right to change doctors on this basis (except when the treatment involves an intimate examination): this will be considered discrimination. But a “transgender” doctor has the right to know that the patient wanted to change him, and on this basis he has the right to refuse to treat such a patient – these are the instructions of the National Health Service.

The invention of an English newspeak, which should “not offend trans people,” is in full swing. And since these psychologically (or psychiatrically) knotted citizens are offended by literally everything they can’t have, breastfeeding cannot be called breastfeeding, the mother should become a “giving birth parent”, and vile alternatives like “bonus” are invented for the word “vagina”. hole” or “front hole”. Of course, women have no right to be offended by this, because we are talking about “feelings of transgender people.”

But not only women. Recently, the Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell, said that the word “father” in the prayer “Our Father” is “problematic”. “Father” can also seem offensive to someone. This already goes beyond “sex change” – but it is still the same attack on the family. First of all, it is for the family, although feminists and even lesbians suffer from “transgender freedom” (they do not want to recognize men who call themselves women as women, and this “offend feelings”).

The ban on “sex change” in Russia simply must take place: we must not slip into this monstrous pit. But what will happen is a fall: balancing on the edge and lying that it won’t be like this with us will not succeed, even one concession will drag others along, and at each step it will be more and more difficult to stop.

I have read the British commentary on dozens of articles about “transgender people” – and every time it strikes me that “transgender freedom” is being implemented against the will of the majority. Most clearly suffer from this. But it can do nothing but buzz in the comments (and they are censored) and for years sue the National Health Service for crippling their children. We in Russia can still hold on. We can’t afford to do this to ourselves yet.