The list of works for the exam in literature has been updated for the sake of a correct value understanding
[ad_1]
Rosobrnadzor explained the changes made to the USE codifier in literature with the new educational program. The list of texts required for passing the exam now opens with Alexander Ostrovsky’s play The Thunderstorm: all earlier literature has disappeared from it, including the works of Alexander Pushkin, Mikhail Lermontov and Nikolai Gogol, but appeared, in particular, Nikolai Ostrovsky’s How the Steel Was Tempered and “Young Guard” Alexander Fadeev. Rosobrnadzor notes: the writers of the “golden age” did not completely disappear from the USE, and, relying on their books, you can get “more than 54% of the maximum score”, but this knowledge is tested at the USE, and the USE is now focused on the program of the 10-11th classes, taking into account recent changes aimed at “educating in the system of traditional values” and “forming a correct value understanding of the events and culture of the 20th century.” Literature teachers complain that some of their students have already begun to prepare for the USE in 2024 and spent time on Pushkin, but at the same time they believe that preparing for the exam will now become easier.
Among the documents that define the structure of the OGE and the Unified State Examination and published for public and professional discussion by the Federal Institute for Pedagogical Change (FIPI) are demo exams, an assessment system and codifiers (skills and theoretical knowledge that will be tested). In particular, the USE codifier in literature (the list of works, knowledge of which is necessary to pass the exam) has undergone significant changes. Previously, it began with “The Tale of Igor’s Campaign”, then it included the works of Fonvizin, Derzhavin and Zhukovsky; Traditionally, much attention was also paid to the first half of the 19th century, to the texts of Griboyedov, Pushkin, Lermontov, and Gogol.
Now these authors are not in the codifier, Alexander Ostrovsky’s Thunderstorm opens it.
The changes also affected the program of the 20th century: for example, Matrenin Dvor by Alexander Solzhenitsyn disappeared from it, but Nikolai Ostrovsky’s How the Steel Was Tempered and Alexander Fadeev’s The Young Guard were added.
Rosobrnadzor (the founder of FIPI) explained to a Kommersant correspondent that “all changes in the USE codifiers are associated with a change in the Federal State Educational Standard (Federal State Educational Standard.— “b”) and the introduction of a single federal educational program for the whole country. Recall that from September 1, 2023, Russian schools must work according to the federal basic general education programs (FOP), the same for the whole country. “In the period 2012-2022, the Federal State Educational Standard of secondary general education operated with extremely generalized formulations of the requirements for the results of mastering the main educational program in the Russian language and literature (the document contained a general list of requirements for two academic subjects), the department believes. standard has not been specified. In the FOP for literature, the list is indeed specified, the 10th grade program begins, like the new USE codifier, with Thunderstorm.
“Knowledge of works of literature written before the first half of the 19th century is fully submitted for verification during the OGE in literature,” Rosobrnadzor notes. “The OGE codifier is built in strict accordance with the Federal State Educational Standard and the FOP of basic general education and includes all the studied works of writers – classics. The USE codifier also clearly reflects the list of works studied in the 10th and 11th grades. Moreover, “the content of the USE supports the principles of historical continuity of the literary process,” they say in Rosobrnadzor, therefore, “when performing a number of tasks, works studied in grades 5–9 may be involved”: “More than 54% of the maximum score of USE participants can receive for completing assignments based on Russian classical literature of the first half of the 19th century.
“The value of Russian classical literature of the first half of the 19th century is undoubted,” Rosobrnadzor notes. “But it is no less important that schoolchildren fully master the best works of Russian literature from other historical eras, which allow them to form a correct, value-filled understanding of modern society.”
Education in the system of traditional values and the formation of a “correct value understanding of the events and culture of the 20th century” explains the expansion of the list of Soviet literature, with special sections of prose and poetry about the Great Patriotic War. In addition, for the first time in the exam, the literature of the peoples of Russia is presented – for example, the works of Rasul Gamzatov, Musa Jalil, Kaisyn Kuliev and Yuri Rytkheu.
Teachers of secondary schools, with whom the Kommersant correspondent managed to talk, refused to appear in the material under their own names and lamented the efforts already expended by future graduates on training in the literature of the first half of the 19th century: from the 10th grade they were preparing for the Unified State Exam using the old codifiers , and “all their labor and time is wasted.” At the same time, teachers note that the assignments included in the USE demo version for comparison with earlier works “still require knowledge of all these texts.”
Associate Professor of the Department of History of Russian Literature and Journalism of the Faculty of Journalism of Moscow State University Yegor Sartakov is dissatisfied with the exclusion from the Unified State Examination of “seven centuries of Russian literature”, he notes that “there is no dependence between the Unified State Examination and the Unified State Examination in literature”, both exams are optional. Theoretically, this may mean that a student can choose the Unified State Examination in Literature without passing the Unified State Examination and thus avoiding testing knowledge acquired in grades 5–9.
Mr. Sartakov believes that the new codifier reflects the desire of “officials to raise the degree of patriotic education”, including at the expense of Soviet literature, and when it was necessary to cut something, “Unfortunately, Pushkin and Gogol fell under the knife.”
The philologist calls the changes “ideological sabotage”, while he notes that it will be easier to prepare students for the exam, since “there are fewer works and it is easier to analyze them.” Director of the Department of Methodology and Development of Educational Programs at MAXIMUM Education Artem Mushta, on the contrary, assesses the changes positively: “The chronological order in which works of literature are now presented is quite logical and allows the child to absorb information in the correct sequence.” “The volume of actively studied texts is reduced, which makes it possible for students to work more carefully with the works on the list,” the expert adds. Dead Souls” and “Hero of Our Time”, this is a serious burden. Reducing the codifier will undoubtedly make life easier for schoolchildren.” Mr. Mushta also notes that “in recent years, literature has been one of the leaders in terms of high scores for those who take exams. Therefore, the new requirements are aimed at updating the requirements for applicants in order to improve the quality of testing their knowledge.”
Note that the public and professional discussion of new codifiers and other documents of the Unified State Exam and the Unified State Examination will last until September 30.
[ad_2]
Source link