The doctor accused of insulting the widow of an SVO soldier was not given his passport back

Pediatrician Buyanova, accused of lying about SVO after a complaint from her widow, decided to be reinstated at work

The Baza Telegram channel, citing sources, reports that Moscow pediatrician Nadezhda Buyanova, who is being tried under a criminal article for distributing fakes about the RF Armed Forces, is trying through the court to be reinstated at work. According to the channel, she filed a corresponding lawsuit. At the same time, the doctor had problems with the documents – sources claim that after the search, interrogation and trial, her passport was not returned.

“In response to all questions, the investigators shrug their shoulders and blame the fact that they probably lost the passport,” asserts Baza. “A woman is also not given a certificate about the loss of a document.”

As previously reported, Buyanova, a pediatrician with 40 years of experience, was fired from the capital’s children’s clinic after the mother of one of the patients complained about her. The woman gave telegram news channels several videos in which she claimed that the doctor allegedly insulted her and the child by speaking negatively about the SVO and the boy’s father who died there. The widow did not provide any evidence other than her statements, but soon the doctor’s house was searched, the pediatrician was detained and taken in for questioning. Subsequently, the court established a preventive measure in the form of a ban on certain actions. A case was initiated against the pediatrician under Part 1 of Article 207.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

Buyanova’s lawyer reported TASS that his client does not admit guilt and believes that she was deliberately slandered. The defense lawyer noted that in court the prosecutor’s office did not support the investigation’s request to send the doctor to a pre-trial detention center and that the investigation was unable to provide justification for the arrest. The lawyer also stated that there were no legal grounds for the doctor’s dismissal from the clinic. According to the lawyer, the dismissal order makes no reference to specific points that the doctor could have violated; she had no disciplinary sanctions in the past.