The court refused the mobilized Petersburger to replace military service with civilian
[ad_1]
The Nevsky District Court refused to satisfy the claim of Kirill Berezin, who asked to replace military service with an alternative civilian one. According to him, participation in hostilities is contrary to his beliefs – he is a believer. Mr. Berezin was called on September 24th. On the same day, he applied for the ACS. Representatives of the Nevsky district military registration and enlistment office said that he did not have such a right. Now Mr. Berezin is in a military unit in Belgorod, where he is undergoing training and is preparing to be sent to the NVO zone. “From the side of the commander there were threats towards Kirill. He was told that he would regret the trial, ”said Marina Tsyganova, a representative of Mr. Berezin, with reference to a colleague of the plaintiff. Kirill Berezin in the lawsuit also reports that he was not offered to undergo a medical examination.
The representative of the defendants (St. Petersburg City Military Commissariat and commissions for the mobilization of the region and the city) Irina Aristarkhova confirmed that Kirill Berezin did not have the right to replace military service. She, according to Ms. Aristarkhova, is available only to young people under 27 years old who are not in the reserve of the RF Armed Forces. Kirill Berezin, continued the representative of the defendants, did not report health problems at the military registration and enlistment office, and records based on the results of the medical commission are kept only in cases where mobilized people report health problems. In addition, she believes that there can be no question of contradicting her convictions, since the plaintiff had already completed military service from 2013 to 2014.
In the measure of preliminary protection, that is, the return to St. Petersburg for the duration of the case, the court refused. A 69-year-old grandmother remained dependent on the conscript.
“He (Kirilla Berezina.— “b”) depression and a tendency to suicidal thoughts,” Ms. Tsyganova told Kommersant. “And he had suicide attempts, but they were not recorded.” Lawyer Nikifor Ivanov, speaking on behalf of the mobilized, said that he would challenge the court’s decision: “First of all, we will file a private complaint in order to challenge the ruling on the refusal to satisfy our application for interim measures. We will also be filing an appeal.”
As of October 18, the district courts of St. Petersburg registered 32 lawsuits challenging decisions on mobilization. Most of all in the Krasnogvardeisky court, where ten applications were received. Three cases were dismissed by the Frunzensky Court, as the plaintiffs abandoned their claims.
[ad_2]
Source link
