The court decided to expedite the consideration of the case of the plunderers of the inheritance of Alexei Batalov

The court decided to expedite the consideration of the case of the plunderers of the inheritance of Alexei Batalov

[ad_1]

The next meeting will take place on Monday.

An unexpected acceleration was received by the consideration of the criminal case against lawyer Mikhail Tsivin, his wife, former actress Natalia Drozhzhina, and notary Bubliya. We recall that they are accused of fraudulently depriving the property, including inheritance, of the widow and daughter of actor Alexei Batalov.

According to the decision of the Zamoskvoretsky Court, adopted as a result of the next meeting on Friday, April 7, consideration will be continued on Monday morning, April 10. Moreover, if Drozhzhina does not appear in court of her own free will, she will be brought forcibly.

As previously reported by “MK”, ​​most of the recent meetings ended with the postponement of consideration for two weeks. This was due, as a rule, to the fact that the former actress was treated. In addition, the defendants changed their lawyers and asked for a postponement due to the fact that the new lawyers need to familiarize themselves with the case. Only the penultimate meeting was postponed for a week due to the absence of Drozhzhina.

She also did not appear at the last meeting – in the opinion of the prosecution (with which the court agreed) unreasonably. However, the defense of the defendants submitted to the court documents confirming that the doctors recommended the accused to undergo home treatment, to avoid physical and psycho-emotional stress. However, this, in the opinion of the prosecution and the court, does not at all indicate that Drozhzhina cannot come to court.

In addition, during the meeting, the representative of the prosecution made a motion to change the preventive measure against the accused and take her into custody, he was supported by the public prosecutor, but the court did not consider the arguments of the prosecution sufficient to make such a decision. After hearing this decision, the public prosecutor petitioned to continue the consideration of the case in the near future. The court supported him.

[ad_2]

Source link