The beating of a one-legged member of the SVO showed two big problems for Russia

Lessons from a vile history

It was in the song that the Lord ordered from dawn to dawn to let the landing into paradise. Here we do not. Here it must be remembered that the status of “participant in the NWO” is not a shield from everyday problems and tragedies, and not at all an indulgence for sins. Again, for the umpteenth time already in our history, we must re-learn how to adequately respond to situations related to the relationship “people at war” – “peaceful society”. And this is all the more difficult because the “starting conditions” are much worse than in Soviet times.

A completely disgusting story happened in the Nerchinsko-Zavodsky district of the Trans-Baikal Territory. Mikhail Taskin, a member of the SVO, who lost his leg during the fighting, was severely beaten. He was beaten precisely for participating in the SVO.

Drunken scumbags stuck to a disabled person in a cafe, and then, when he and his friends left, they caught up with them, rammed the car, beat them up, and tore off the awards. The reaction turned out to be tough – deputy Khinshtein, the governor of the region, joined in. Everyone will get what they deserve and in full – both those who directly beat, and those girls who stood nearby and cheered on their buddies. Zero tolerance for scoundrels is required here – as you know, in any article of the Criminal Code there is a minimum and a maximum. We need a maximum.

And, alas, you need to understand that it will only be bringing down the temperature of the patient. The inflammation itself will take a long time to heal. More than one generation has grown up, brought up on the ideology of consumption, with an inflamed “I”. It was in the Soviet school that they taught that “I” is the last letter of the alphabet. And for those who beat Mikhail, he was the personification of lost personal amenities – the disappeared McDonald’s, Zara, the more expensive iPhone and trips to Turkey.

Yes, thanks to the SVO, a healthy ideology, work, and upbringing are returning to schools. But, I repeat, the result of treatment will not be soon. Both veterans and the healthy part of society will have to face nasty attitude more than once.

There is another side of the coin. It is absolutely naive to believe that the fighters who returned from the front will be all as one, white, fluffy and law-abiding. Cases “I fought – I have the right” will be enough. And the boundaries of this right will sometimes not be contained in the Criminal Code.

Indeed, as the belligerent philosopher Alexander Khodakovsky noted, “a veteran is not always a purified and enlightened nimbo-bearer, but often an aggravated and weighed down sociopath.” So, there will be crimes by veterans, there will be courts. And, of course, all this will be used by our enemy to pump up hysteria in society. It will be difficult to keep a cool head and not get emotional.

There are no universal recipes here for how to avoid problems. They are inevitable. However, our recent historical experience suggests at least one useful thing. The phrase “we didn’t send you there” should be forgotten like a bad dream, disappear from the lexicon altogether.