Please do not add exceptions to the rules
[ad_1]
Another discussion about the fate of the Road Traffic Rules took place between the authorities and social activists at the Road Traffic Russia congress. Representatives of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation (PC) insist that the traffic rules should not be edited, but rewritten entirely, taking into account the prospect of unmanned vehicles, delivery robots and other vehicles of the future appearing on the roads. Members of the OP even managed to convey this idea to President Vladimir Putin. The Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Ministry of Transport, and the State Traffic Safety Inspectorate urge people not to make “sudden movements” and limit themselves to point corrections.
A discussion about the fate of traffic rules unfolded yesterday at the Road Traffic Russia congress based on the November 3 meeting between President Vladimir Putin and members of the Public Chamber. Then a member of the OP, Alexander Kholodov, complained to the head of state that the traffic rules are constantly being “patched”: more than 50 amendments have been made in recent years. The expert suggested, without waiting for the formal date of termination of the current rules (2029), to prepare a “completely new” document, refusing to make “spot” amendments. Vladimir Putin responded by offering to discuss the situation with the head of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Vladimir Kolokoltsev. At a meeting that took place on the same day, the minister promised Alexander Kholodov to take into account the proposals, noting that “any changes must be verified.” Now everything depends on the president’s instructions following the meeting with the OP, Mr. Kholodov made it clear yesterday, speaking at Road Traffic Russia.
About 120 amendments need to be made to the rules, calculated Dmitry Popov, leading specialist of the St. Petersburg Traffic Management Directorate. In the current traffic rules, the expert gave an example, there is no term “turn”: “I turned the steering wheel a little – is it a turn or not? And there is a lot of that. Amendments are needed, but they must be verified, subjected to serious examination and not cause a legal shock among ordinary people.”
“The traffic rules, as they say, are a document written in blood,” said Deputy Head of the Russian State Traffic Safety Inspectorate Oleg Ponaryin. “It takes into account many years of experience in analyzing the traffic situation and the attempts of entire generations of traffic organizers to regulate conflict processes created during the movement process. Yes, probably, the rules should be clear and simple, but in this process the main thing for us is not to throw out everything key from the traffic rules, focusing on a superficial description of the processes.”
“We can simplify the style, but the essence will not change,” Vladimir Lugovenko, deputy director of the department of state policy in the field of automobile and urban passenger transport of the Ministry of Transport, joined the discussion. “There is the Vienna Convention on Road Traffic with the main postulates that underlie our traffic regulations, and We won’t change anything fundamentally.” “Radical” rewriting of the rules can mislead citizens, especially those who studied according to the old standards, Mr. Lugovenko warned.
“The rules are imperfect, it’s no secret,” admitted the head of the Scientific Center for Road Safety of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, Dmitry Mitroshin. “There are some shortcomings, perhaps there are nuances that create inconvenience for drivers. But how fundamental are they?” The expert called the traffic rules a “living” document, so regularly amended amendments are not “nonsense.” “The rules must change in an evolutionary manner, maintaining continuity and without sudden movements,” he believes. “After all, even a simple change in the numbering of points can confuse people. It will not be possible to simplify traffic rules. Moreover, traffic rules are complex in all countries.” At the same time, Dmitry Mitroshin noted, the rules are often taught in driving schools abroad using “methodically verified” manuals written in simplified language for the average person: “But here, driving schools have turned traffic rules into a textbook.” Dmitry Popov supported him, recalling that in the 90s of the last century there were official comments on traffic rules for teachers of driving schools: “It would be reasonable if the traffic police would now publish the same verified text written in a clear language.”
[ad_2]
Source link