Named the reasons for the reluctance of Harry and Meghan to appear at the coronation of Charles III
[ad_1]
The approaching coronation of Charles III and his wife Queen Consort Camilla, which will take place on May 6 at Westminster Abbey, raises the question of whether the rebellious Prince Harry and his wife Meghan will be invited. Having managed to spin several high-profile scandals, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex still received a letter from the king. But whether the young will be present at the celebration remains a mystery.
On Sunday it became known that Prince Harry and his wife Meghan received an invitation to the coronation of King Charles III. “I can confirm that the Duke recently received an email from His Majesty’s office regarding the coronation. An immediate decision on whether the Duke and Duchess will attend is not being released by us at this time,” a spokesman for the Duke told CNN on Sunday.
King Charles and his wife Camilla will be crowned on May 6 at Westminster Abbey. For three days, celebrations will be held across the country, which will be followed not only by residents of the UK, but also by people from all over the world. Buckingham Palace said the coronation itself would be “a solemn religious service and an occasion for celebration and spectacle.” This, according to the main residence of the British monarchs, reflects “the role of the king today and a look into the future, rooted in long traditions.”
This phrase was interpreted by experts as a hint of the restrained nature of the future celebration, which will be reflected, perhaps, in the shortened duration of the procedure and minor amendments to the elements of the ritual. It was stressed that this ceremony would not be like the one his mother had experienced seven decades earlier.
To date, the palace has not specified which members of the royal family will appear in the procession from Buckingham Palace to Westminster Abbey, as well as on the palace balcony at the end of the day, along with the king and queen consort. And such uncertainty is understandable, since since the death of Elizabeth II on September 8, 2022, not everything has been calm in the Kingdom. This includes the expulsion of Prince Andrew by King Charles III from Buckingham Palace due to allegations of sexual harassment of minors. The source of the newspaper The Sun then claimed that “any presence of Prince Andrew in the palace is officially over … He is not acting as a member of the royal family. He’s on his own.” Such scandals include the publication of the explosive memoirs of the Duke of Sussex “Spare”. And in general, the Sussex family has repeatedly uttered in public space (for example, in a frank interview with Oprah Winfrey or the Netflix series) a lot of accusatory speeches against their own family, which has dealt a serious blow to the image of the British monarchy. On Saturday, Harry took part in a pay-per-view live chat with writer and therapist Gabor Mate, where he admitted that “throughout his life, in his younger years, he felt a little different than the rest of the family.”
Of the latter, which demonstrated the very specific attitude of the king towards his rebellious son, was a request to leave the official British residence of the couple, Frogmore Cottage. By the way, Harry and Meghan spent 2.4 million pounds sterling (about $ 3 million) from the money of British taxpayers to repair the property. The work included the removal of the chimney, the alteration of the roof, the installation of new stairs, a fireplace, and a floating wooden floor. After the couple retired from public life, the refurbishment (especially at that cost) caused controversy. After his move to California, the state money was returned, but the residue remained.
The current silence of Harry and Megan is connected with another fact. On the day of the coronation, May 6, the son of the Dukes of Sussex Archie turns 4 years old. Social media users even suspected a strange coincidence: “I wonder why King Charles decided to hold his coronation on Archie’s birthday? Maybe to share this special day with his grandson, or did he do it to steal the special day from his grandson? Some even put forward exotic versions: “Charles III wants the media to bombard Harry and Megan until next year, who will they sacrifice …”.
In general, there was enough ground for negativity. And because of this, Harry and Megan are in no hurry to give a lightning-fast answer about their participation in the magnificent May celebration.
Several royal experts have suggested that the couple’s significant drop in popularity in the UK could make them think twice about their travel plans. As Christopher Andersen, author of The King, noted, “More and more, it seems that Harry and Meghan may well refuse the coronation. There are certainly genuine safety concerns, and there is also the possibility that the Sussexes will be booed widely. It is highly doubtful that they would be willing to face the prospect of this kind of public humiliation again, especially on their son Archie’s birthday.” However, even considering all these troubles, Andersen does not believe that Suits star Megan will remain in California if her husband nevertheless agrees to take part in the coronation: “Will Harry come alone? Unlikely in light of Archie’s birthday and the fact that Harry and Meghan need to show a united front.”
But the host of the podcast about the royal family “To Di For Daily” Kinsey Schofield shared with Fox News Digital a different version of the slowness of the young in their own decisions. Schofield is sure that Harry may well be alone at the celebration. The fact is that in Megan there is a special resentment: “She is upset and depressed. It’s not that Meghan feels left out of planning. Meghan feels the palace is only fighting for Prince Harry’s presence and they don’t care if she shows up or not. And this does not suit her. Rejection is one of the biggest dangers for her… she understands that her brand in the US is growing in value due to proximity to the royal family.
“I think there is a possibility that Harry can quickly prepare for the coronation on his own. He said during the Netflix documentary that he lacks aspects of royal life… Judging by his military experience, duty is also important to him. There is a feeling that now it is his duty to attend the ceremony as the son of the king, ”Schofield explained.
Confirm the difficult situation in the relationship and the sources of The Daily Telegraph. They claim that if the couple refuses, they will be accused of “disparaging” the royal family. But if the Sussexes come, they risk being booed or branded as hypocrites. Friends of the dukes are sure that their visit (if it happens) will be brief. Royal expert Hilary Fordwich summed it up: “It’s a lose-lose situation for them. Being a laughing stock is not what Meghan and Harry were aiming for.” But so far, that’s how it works.
Newspaper headline:
Coronation Games
[ad_2]
Source link
