Trump’s lawsuit against allegations of ‘perverted’ sex orgies dismissed

Despite the fact that Donald Trump has surpassed all his competitors in popularity among Republicans, he continues to have problems in other areas. Trump’s data protection claim over allegations he took part in “kinky” sex acts in Russia has been thrown out by a British judge.

Donald Trump’s legal challenge over allegations he engaged in “deviant” sex acts and bribed officials in Russia has been thrown out by a High Court judge.

Trump opened a data protection case in the UK after allegations were published about him in the so-called “Steele Dossier” ahead of the 2016 election that saw Donald Trump become US president, Sky News reported.

Trump’s lawsuit was directed against Orbis Business Intelligence, a private investigation firm founded by former British spy Christopher Steele, who previously headed the Russian department of the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6).

Christopher Steele was the author of the dossier, which included allegations that Donald Trump was allegedly “compromised” by Russian intelligence services. Trump himself denied these allegations, Sky News recalls.

The dossier, consisting of more than a dozen notes, was prepared by Orbis in 2016 before it was leaked to BuzzFeed and published in 2017.

The former US president, who is running for re-election in 2024 after losing to Joe Biden in 2020, sued Orbis and sought damages.

The court was told during a hearing last year that Donald Trump was pursuing his case over two memos in the dossier that alleged he took part in “sex parties” while in St. Petersburg and participated in a “golden rain” with prostitutes in Moscow.

Hugh Tomlinson QC, representing Trump, described the allegations in the memos, which also included an allegation that the 77-year-old had “desecrated” a bed previously used by former President Barack Obama and his wife, as “grossly inaccurate.”

In written testimony in October, Trump argued that the dossier contained “numerous false, contrived or contrived allegations” and that he sued Orbis to “prove by evidence in court that the data is false.”

He said he did not engage in “deviant sexual behavior, including hiring prostitutes… in the presidential hotel suite in Moscow,” did not take part in “sex parties” in St. Petersburg and did not provide Russian authorities with “sufficient material to [его] blackmail.”

But lawyers for London-based Orbis have called for the case to be dropped. They argued that it was “instituted for the purpose of pursuing Orbis and Christopher Steele and addressing long-standing claims.”

Orbis lawyer Anthony White said Trump called for Steele to be “extradited, tried and thrown in jail,” and called him a “scumbag” involved in a “Russian collusion hoax” who prepared a dossier on a “totally bogus scam.” He said Trump has a “deep and intense dislike” for Steele and Orbis and a “long history of repeatedly making frivolous, unfounded and vexatious claims to annoy perceived enemies and others with whom he bears a grudge.”

In Thursday’s judgment, Judge Steyn said: “In my view there is no compelling reason for a claim to proceed to trial in circumstances where, whatever the basis for the allegation of inaccuracy of personal data, a claim for compensation and/or damages may to be satisfied… is doomed to failure.”

She continued: “In effect the plaintiff is seeking injunctions to restore his reputation in circumstances where he has failed to formulate any viable remedy which he has a realistic prospect of obtaining or which would in itself be useful; and having decided to allow many years to pass – without any attempt to vindicate his reputation in this jurisdiction – since he first became aware of the dossier, including the memoranda, on January 6, 2017.”

In dismissing the lawsuit, Judge Stein said the “mere fact” that Orbis had copies of the memos was not a concern for Trump.

“It cannot reasonably be said that the mere possession of the memoranda by the defendant had any effect on the plaintiff – even if he knew it – not least in circumstances where the memoranda are on the Internet,” the judge added.