From July 2024, payments for housing and communal services will increase for a number of categories of citizens
[ad_1]
From July next year, Moscow will introduce increased fees for housing and communal services for residents of some “non-standard” houses. The government of the Russian capital adopted a corresponding resolution. The list includes, in particular, historical and cultural monuments, houses over 70 years old and “skyscrapers” with a height of 75 meters or more. “MK” looked into how much the numbers in receipts for utility services will increase and why the innovation is being introduced.
Resolution No. 2420-PP dated December 8 of the outgoing year, under the discreet title “On introducing amendments to Moscow government decree No. 848-PP dated December 13, 2016,” changes quite a lot in the tariff setting system of the Moscow housing stock.
The biggest burden will fall on the shoulders of owners and tenants living in “cultural heritage sites.” The increasing coefficient to the cost of maintaining the house for them will be 1.201, that is, plus 20.1%.
For living in high-rise buildings over 75 meters, citizens will pay 10.3% more according to this column.
If the house has a vacuum waste disposal system (there is one in the experimental quarter in Northern Chertanovo: waste is delivered by air flow through a pipeline into sealed containers), you will have to pay plus 12.5% on top of the standard tariff.
The special list includes individual and pilot projects: plus 5.2%.
Residents of houses built before 1953 inclusive, but not falling under the above criteria, will in any case pay 7.1% more for housing maintenance.
A complete address list will be compiled by specialists from the Moscow Housing and Communal Services Department.
— The capital’s housing stock is very diverse. Moreover, the overwhelming majority – over 20 thousand buildings out of 32 thousand – date back to the years of mass construction from 1960 to 1999, says Kirill Kulakov, president of the Regional Association of Appraisers. — But there are residential buildings in Moscow built before the revolution. There are about one and a half thousand of them, mostly old apartment buildings located in the historical center of Moscow.
The complexity of operating such houses is obvious, continues Kirill Kulakov. First of all, they require more funds to maintain facades in proper condition. Look at the houses along Myasnitskaya Street and it will become clear that complex architectural solutions require constant attention and funds. In addition, engineering communications are outdated, and their replacement is carried out on individual projects. The iron roofs of such buildings must be regularly cleared of snow, avoiding ice and icicles. Here are just the simplest examples showing why the maintenance of such houses is significantly more expensive than typical panel houses.
“The city partially passes on these costs to residents. There is social and economic justice in this, since apartments in such buildings are significantly more expensive than in Soviet-era buildings or even in modern high-rise buildings,” says the expert. — By the way, about high-rise buildings. Obviously, their maintenance is also more expensive, since high-altitude work will have to hire professionals with special permits. In general, the Moscow government, by its decision, differentiated the cost of servicing the housing stock depending on the real costs of servicing it.
The leader of the public movement “People’s Garden” Fyodor Mezentsev considers it logical that if the house is not new or has design features, its operation is more expensive. But why should the owner of an apartment in a building that is recognized as a cultural heritage site pay more for services? – the expert asks, emphasizing that the costs associated with the status of a cultural heritage site have already been included in the budget. For the “status” of the house, the owner already pays more in the form of property taxes.
“As for houses built in 1953 and earlier, almost all so-called Stalinist houses, the quality of construction of which still causes admiration, are subject to the increasing coefficient,” continues Fedor Mezentsev. — Taking into account the already high fees for housing and communal services, it seems that the new coefficients were lobbied by management companies. This initiative will entail an increase in Moscow budget expenditures on subsidies to citizens entitled to partial reimbursement of utility costs.
Increasing coefficients are not all the “surprises” hidden in the document. According to one of the paragraphs of the resolution, “citizens who are owners of residential premises who have a single residential premises and are registered in it” are excluded from the list of beneficiaries for paying for the maintenance of housing stock. And also tenants on social rent within the established area standards (by the way, these same standards disappear from the document altogether). This follows from the updated clause 2.1 of resolution No. 848.
Preferential tariffs are reserved only for citizens – users of residential premises under a free use agreement. This is not a social group, but a special category of residents, primarily people with disabilities. Those on the waiting list – families with disabled people or residents of boarding schools (nursing homes) – can receive such specialized housing. Moreover, housing is provided under such an agreement only in replacement of existing housing, including privatized housing. “The housing that you occupied before the conclusion of the contract is transferred to the city free of charge,” it is written in the rules regarding this category of residents on the city portal mos.ru.
The annexes to the resolution have also been updated and contain even more details. In relation to social rent (Appendix 1), rent (that is, payment for this same rental) was not previously charged for living in houses without one or more amenities, worn out by 60% or more, as well as in houses of the K-7, II-32, 1 series -335, II-35. We are talking about Khrushchev buildings of the early series. The new version adds a clarification: in order not to be charged for social security, it is necessary that a house from this series be included in the renovation with a resettlement period of 2024–2025.
Newspaper headline:
House of increased household tariffs
[ad_2]
Source link
