Deputies did not dare to punish for refusing to mobilize
[ad_1]
Deputies of United Russia (ER), heads of the Duma committees on defense and security, Andrei Kartapolov and Vasily Piskarev, said that “the State Duma is not considering” a bill introducing liability for military service evasion during the period of mobilization: the initiative was considered at the very beginning of the announcement of partial mobilization , but after its completion, the relevant amendments have lost their relevance.
Earlier on Tuesday, the Izvestia newspaper announced the intention of deputies and senators of United Russia to submit to the Duma a bill on criminal penalties for draft evaders: a fine of 200,000 to 500,000 rubles, forced labor or imprisonment for up to five years. Among the authors were Messrs. Kartapolov and Piskarev, as well as the head of the Federation Council Committee on Defense Viktor Bondarev.
Criminal liability for citizens for refusing to participate in partial mobilization in the absence of a delay has not yet been described. In the Criminal Code there is only liability for evasion from military service. On September 20, the Duma adopted a bill on imprisonment for up to 10 years for voluntary surrender and up to 15 years for looting in wartime, amendments to the Criminal Code introduced the concepts of “mobilization”, “martial law” and “wartime”. In addition, a prison term is provided for leaving the unit during the period of hostilities and failure to comply with the order of the commander.
In early October, the first criminal case was initiated in Russia on evasion of mobilization under Part 1 of Art. 328 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. A few days later, the prosecutor’s office canceled the decision to initiate proceedings. Andrey Klishas, head of the Federation Council Committee on Constitutional Legislation, explained that the subjects of the crime under this article are citizens “subject to conscription,” and the question of the need to amend the legislation in this part is subject to “detailed discussion” with the State Duma.
On Tuesday afternoon, deputies from relevant committees were unavailable for comment to journalists. Toward evening, Mr. Klishas wrote on Telegram that he does not consider the introduction of criminal liability for evasion of mobilization relevant at the moment, “despite the obvious gap in the legislation.” The bill was prepared, and one of the deputies “leaked” it to the media, although they were not going to introduce it in the near future, says Kommersant’s interlocutor in the Duma. An informed Kommersant source in United Russia confirms that work was underway on the document. According to him, they decided to abandon the idea precisely because one of the participants in the discussion of the initiative told reporters about it.
[ad_2]
Source link
