Demographic bottom: teen abortion ban raises questions

In a good way, girls at this age should not become pregnant at all under any circumstances. And here, the availability of contraceptives, the ability to anonymously seek psychological or social help, including elementary education of schoolchildren about how to build sexual relationships and protect themselves, if both children are not yet ready to become parents, could help. There was such a subject in the late USSR “Ethics and psychology of family life.” Even though it was taught naively, at least some attempts to tell young people about what was really important in the lessons were made by adults then.

Bigotry is just pretending that there is no sex in our country and never was. We have already gone through this at the previous stage of our cyclical history and it did not lead to anything good. Otherwise, why would the chaste Soviet eighth-graders, who believe that storks bring children, go all out in the 90s?

They just twisted the spring to the limit, and then it burst – according to the laws of physics.

But now we are not threatened with any “sex-enlightenment”, as deputy Nina Ostanina, by the way, the head of the State Duma Committee on Family, Women and Children, said. Nina Alexandrovna demanded that any opportunity for sexual education be replaced with basic military training. Which will be done in the very near future.

Therefore, young Russian women will soon know how to disassemble a Kalashnikov assault rifle, but how to build relationships so as not to get into unpleasant situations, no.

You also need to sell contraceptives in pharmacies. like alcohol – according to the passport. No 18 – no condoms. And on reception to the gynecologist behind means of protection – too only with parents.

Of course, it is wild in the 21st century to use abortion as a method of family planning. Adult aunts for sure. But we are talking about children. who have no plans at all. Just like that…it happened. And now what? Break their life completely?

Indeed, in most cases, such a delicate problem as the pregnancy of a youngster does not arise in the most prosperous families and with not the most established communication between adults and children.

When this happens to adequate parents, then the mother, most likely, will not let things take their course, she will run to the doctor, they will decide together whether to give birth or not.

And, if a girl comes to an abortion without a mother, then this is her situation. But before you could take a girlfriend or a significant adult with you, how now?

Now it won’t. Adequate parent or not. Does she drink. Is it abusive to the fullest that the daughter is ready to look for affection anywhere, if only not at home? Will she kill the girl when she learns that she herself will become a grandmother? By the way, it is possible that we are talking about the fact that both parents gave consent to the manipulation. That is, also to inform dad – all of a sudden he dreams of becoming a grandfather at 40 years old.

Take it out and put it, the family in full collection should by the hand (and not only at 15, but at almost 18 years old) come to the gynecologist so that they are sanded and persuaded to keep it. Because the plan will also be lowered on the doctors, no doubt about it. This is a government position. Even Igor Strelkov recently spoke on this topic in his channel:

“If you become pregnant, then you must give birth! And doctors who dissuade and talk nonsense – the death penalty.

How many girls, in a very vulnerable position, under such conditions would prefer to get drunk on the pills recommended by their girlfriends? Or jump off the closet? Boil in boiling water? Grow an onion from within?

What other home-grown methods were there in the “demographically prosperous” 30-50s, when abortions were banned in the Soviet Union under pain of criminal liability? Until now, there are not even approximate statistics of mortality due to criminal abortions in those days and at that level of development of medicine.

Have the initiators thought at least approximately what this could mean in the future now?

Moreover, sometimes not only young mothers will pay for this, but also the children born to them. Will they be happy, born in such circumstances? Who and how will raise them if a schoolgirl mother writes a refusal? State?

Yes, we have a demographic bottom, everyone knows that. About half a million women a year refuse to be mothers. Something must be done about this. And, as usual, the carrot method – to make life better, so that women themselves want to give birth, lost to the stick method. Limit the conditions under which they can have abortions.

Of course there are not enough people. And in the future it will be missed even more. In two years of a pandemic, minus one and a half million excess deaths. Next year’s budget includes another minus of almost a million pensioners. All those who left must be replaced by someone.

“We need more and more fighters – the builders of this life. We need people. Abortion, the destruction of nascent life, is unacceptable in our state. In our life there can be no gap between the personal and the public,” was written in 1936, when abortion was completely banned in the USSR under Stalin.

The gradual restriction of abortions in today’s Russian Federation has been talked about for a long time.

The first stage is to withdraw them from the CHI system, opponents of abortion motivate this by the fact that “taxpayers should not pay for the killing of innocent babies.” Despite the fact that the fate of grown babies in a country whose citizens pay with their taxes and not like that, the public is not very worried.

And now they want to put teenagers who have made a mistake in conditions where they either risk their lives or give birth. In the end, an adult woman will always find a way to solve her problem, even if the restrictions become tighter.

The girl may think that it will resolve and so …