An immunologist assessed the consequences for a person who was vaccinated against COVID 217 times: “Bad practice”
[ad_1]
The authoritative medical journal The Lancet reported a unique case of overvaccination: a 62-year-old man living in Magdeburg (Germany) “intentionally and for personal reasons” received 217 vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 over a 29-month period, starting in the summer of 2021. This occurred outside the scope of clinical trials and contrary to national vaccination recommendations. He probably would have continued this practice as long as he had veins, if he had not been accidentally caught in the act and accused of fraud.
The Magdeburg prosecutor has begun an investigation into this strange fraud case – while evidence is being collected. The authorities have already accused the man of defrauding the healthcare system and are going to put him on trial: according to them, before each new vaccination, he always reported that he had never been vaccinated before. However, he did about half of the vaccinations privately, that is, at his own expense.
Meanwhile, doctors are more interested not in his fraudulent schemes, but in the immunological consequences of over-vaccination: after all, there is not a single similar case known in the world. The man has already actively and voluntarily agreed to provide medical information and even donate blood and saliva. It is known that throughout the entire over-vaccination schedule there have not been any reports of any adverse events associated with immunization. Despite the fact that he received vaccines from four different companies.
From November 2019 to October 2023, 62 routine indicators of clinical biochemical analysis did not reveal any abnormalities in the man’s tests. It is also curious that the patient had no evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, as evidenced by repeated negative results of SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests, PCR and nucleocapsid serology. “As a result, no interesting side effects were found. The blood tests, which were checked retroactively for the entire vaccination period, were normal. They found a lot of antibodies to coronavirus – more than usual in vaccinated people, but not by much. Often he was vaccinated for money under fictitious names,” experts explain.
The investigation showed that the German, concerned about the possibility of becoming infected, took vaccinations in different regions of Germany (for example, in Saxony he was injected 95 times, and in Saxony-Anhalt several dozen more times). In the last 9 months alone, he has received 130 vaccines. The Freie Presse newspaper reports that a man sometimes received three (!) vaccinations in one day.
He went for vaccinations to Saxony, mainly to Leipzig, and showed up with blank immunization certificates in different names, presumably for resale to vaccine-phobes, but was caught in March 2022. When mass vaccination efforts were stopped in Eulenburg, Saxony, in early March, a man was found to have blank vaccination cards and vaccination cards filled out under other names. Today he is accused of multiple frauds. There is also a suspicion that the man was selling fake vaccination certificates. But there is still no reliable information about his motives. “There was a scandal in Slovenia when compulsory vaccination was introduced – people hired homeless people, and for a reasonable fee they administered vaccinations for those who wanted to live without restrictions, but were afraid to get vaccinated. But they were far from such a record,” says our compatriot from Slovenia Vitaly on the social network.
When the man was arrested in early April, there was no evidence of any health problems caused by the multiple vaccinations. According to German infectious disease specialist Dietmar Bayer, a member of the Saxon Vaccination Commission, there is no need to be afraid that vaccinations may cause any harm: the immune system adapts to constant refreshment and at some point stops responding to the vaccine altogether.
“As a result, the person did not get sick with Covid, the neutralization and T-cell response in his blood turned out to be 5-10 times stronger than average, but quite within the range of normal variation among vaccinated people. Although he was found to have antibodies in his saliva, which are rare among ordinary vaccinated people, says American geneticist Dmitry Prus. – In general, the diversity of antibodies produced by him is the most common – there is neither a preferential growth of individual clones, nor an increase in diversity with somatic changes (from a scientific point of view, this is the most interesting of the conclusions). And, of course, if a person had a more difficult reaction to vaccines from the very beginning, he would hardly have taken this path, so he almost certainly tolerated vaccinations unusually well from the very beginning.”
As the famous immunologist Nikolai Kryuchkov told MK, like any medicine, vaccines are used according to a certain proven scheme: “Before they are introduced into practice, vaccines are assessed on many parameters of safety and effectiveness, first in animals, then in people. Therefore, the regimen recommended in the instructions for vaccination should be used – with very rare exceptions. Regimens that provide other doses, frequency of administration and indications for use should not be used, since their safety and effectiveness have not been proven in studies. Any vaccines can cause side effects even when used properly, including such extremely rare complications as myocarditis and central nervous system damage. And if we use them more often than recommended (and even more so much more often), we generally cannot predict the likelihood and composition of adverse events. So it is a rather bad practice to violate the instructions for use according to the scheme and dosage: this automatically leads to the fact that a person finds himself in the area of the unknown and unpredictable. And such colossal volumes of application, as described in The Lancet, are generally extreme: no one can predict how the body will react to such interventions. In this case, the person was lucky in that no security problems arose, although they could have.”
— What can we say about efficiency?
“It is clear that this person’s goal was to protect himself as much as possible.” But the immune system doesn’t work that way. The vaccine contains either the infection antigen itself or its precursors, as a result of which the body, without experiencing the infection, encounters its symptoms. And the immune system trains to recognize it. It is pointless to stimulate the immune system too much: it will not have additional resources, and it will not recognize the antigen better. Moreover: an imbalance may arise. For example, mRNA vaccines can enter different cells of the body and disrupt the functioning of a large number of cells, and if you inject them three times a day, it is not known when they will recover. That is, it can be dangerous. This person could have suffered damage to the nervous or cardiovascular system. Protection would have occurred if he had been vaccinated every 5 months; There was simply no need to get vaccinated more often.
— Can this case somehow help science?
— It turned out to be a kind of special case of biohacking. By completing the examination, clinicians will be able to obtain valuable low-level evidence information that fits the “case report” category. To draw any conclusions, they do not have enough participants in the experiment and there is no comparison group. But the information can be valuable, since it will show the work of different parts of the immune system. This is, of course, useful, but I would not recommend obtaining data so voluntarily: this is an experiment in violation of all rules and norms. Well, this, of course, is a reason to study the gaps and loopholes in the healthcare organization system. I basically don’t see any positive aspects for this person.
Newspaper headline:
Grafted to the whole head
[ad_2]
Source link
