Absenteeism by State Duma deputies was explained by their reluctance to fall under sanctions
[ad_1]
Absenteeism by State Duma deputies may be due to their reluctance to be sanctioned. This explanation was given by political scientist Evgeny Minchenko after information appeared that two parliamentarians, Boris Paikin and Yuri Napso, could be deprived of their mandates for absenteeism.
In conversation with NSN The political scientist did not rule out the possibility that deputies do not want to “expose themselves to sanctions” by voting when it comes to business representatives.
“As I understand it, most of them are already on some lists, but everyone has different stories,” Minchenko noted.
Information about plans to deprive Paikin and Napso of their powers in the State Duma appeared on Thursday, November 30. It was reported that Napso began voting on November 1 after a break since April 11; Paikin never voted in the autumn session of the lower house of parliament.
Earlier it became known that a bill was introduced to the State Duma on the labeling of tonic drinks, in particular, energy workers. It is proposed that the containers in which they go on sale should indicate the harm they cause to health.
[ad_2]
Source link
