Why Putin spoke about the confrontation within one people

If we slightly alter the words of Vladimir Vladimirovich, said this week, about the fact that “the conflict in Ukraine is, in fact, a confrontation within one people”, and say this: “the conflict in Ukraine is, in fact, a confrontation within one country” , then past events acquire logical harmony.

How else, if we do not accept this assumption, can Russia’s return to the “grain deal” be explained? Initially, it was clear that this was a global scam and “starving African children” – they, for the sake of entourage, would not receive anything. And so it happened. Putin would later say “they cheated again.” But only after the attack on our fleet using the “grain corridor” Russia said: that’s it, karapuziki. And it was here that the confrontation within the country began, which this time was won by the “traders” – a rapid return to the deal took place.

Foreign Minister Lavrov turned on the diplomat to some unimaginable power and very carefully noted that “the implementation of the Ukrainian part of the“ grain deal ”was resumed, but there is no result in unblocking the export of Russian fertilizers and grain.” Igor Konashenkov, who said: “The Russian Federation considers that the guarantees received at the moment seem sufficient, and resumes the implementation of the agreement,” I personally was frankly sorry. I know Igor Evgenievich personally and I understand how uncomfortable he was.

Because to believe in some kind of Ukrainian guarantees, even if Zelensky signed them with a bloody nose, this is madness. For eight years they believed in the “Minsk agreements” and trusted so much that they had to start the NWO.

Because Ukraine immediately trampled on Russian statements with pleasure and gloating, saying that it did not give any additional guarantees.

Because, according to specialized websites that track the movement of ships, a container ship has already passed through the “grain corridor” to Ukraine and moored at … an oil terminal (and what did it bring in this case?), on Sunday two tankers: Mainland and Brave. Problems, you say, with the fuel of the APU?

Against this background, the Day of National Unity looked ambiguous. It really finally made sense – the people rallied. But this is only the first semantic part. The publicist Dmitry Olshansky wrote well about the second one: “For it (the holiday) to sound in full voice, all that is needed is that its content is not hushed up evasively and cunningly, but pronounced from all the stands, brightly and distinctly. I will repeat once again its simple and beautiful story. Russian people. Self-organized. In the militia. They themselves chose Minin and Pozharsky as their commanders. We went to Moscow. We returned the Kremlin. “Respected partners” were expelled from Russia. And along with them, they expelled those bosses who were at the same time with the “partners.”

So the question arises: isn’t the “natural process of purification” of the elite too expensive, should they start a regular course of anthelmintic? Because the people’s militia of Minin and Pozharsky not only “expelled those chiefs who were at the same time with the” partners “, but also chose a new government for themselves.

There was another moment explaining what was happening on the holiday.

Margarita Simonyan wrote a post about how, in the end, Russians and Ukrainians will live in love and harmony. This post was like a fat chocolate cake with abundant swirls of cream, which she generously poured with molasses and decorated with berries. Well, there are black-browed Oksanas, “to drink in a tavern on three tables unfamiliar with each other the song “Nothing like a month”, “let’s crack the local cherries and crush”, “let’s get up, remember the martyrs who died in the war for it to become that way”. This, they say, is denazification.

Secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine Oleksiy Danilov answered her. And he explained that the beautiful Oksanas “will spit on the dog graves of your husbands, lying with their necks folded”, that they will look with pleasure at how the Russian Federation “scatters in bloody lumps”.

Margarita Simonyan, in my opinion and with all due respect, is mistaken in thinking that there are some real, those still, from the images of the bright Soviet past, Ukrainians. And they are not. On the territory of the former Ukrainian SSR, there are simply Russians, there are brainwashed and spiritually ill Russians, and there is an artificially created political nation of completely reborn people who call themselves Ukrainians. And all that we can and must do is take the Russian and Russians for ourselves, and put a straitjacket on the political nation.

Because it is a conflict within one people, within one country.