The explosion of the Crimean bridge: a chronicle of a widely publicized terrorist attack

The Americans presented their alibi in advance

About what is now called by our officialdom “the incident on the Crimean bridge” (this is from the report of the Investigative Committee of Russia on the initiation of a criminal case), officially frostbitten people in Kyiv have been dreaming for half a year. Back in April, the head of the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council, Alexei Danilov, said that Ukraine would destroy the Crimean bridge at the first opportunity.

Dmitry Medvedev then called Danilov “stoned” and threatened “that he, I hope, understands that he will be a retaliatory target.” And the head of the Crimea, Aksyonov, noted that “God does not give a horn to a vigorous cow.”

Even now it is not clear to me what “will be the reciprocal goal”. After all, there were already plenty of reasons to carry out Medvedev’s threats. These are attacks on the Crimean Belbek airfield, and on targets in the Belgorod and Kursk regions of Russia.

And now Ukrainian officials do not tremble at all. The same Danilov unequivocally hints in his social networks that the undermining of the Crimean bridge is a slightly belated gift for Vladimir Putin’s last birthday. Moreover, Danilov did this by overlaying the famous musical congratulations of US President John F. Kennedy from Marilyn Monroe on the video of the fire, where she sings “Happy Birthday, Mr. President” (what a wide field for revelry of psychoanalysts). And adviser to the Office of the President of Ukraine Mykhailo Podolyak confessed to a crime against a civilian infrastructure object with a mysterious message in social networks in English; “Crimea, bridge, beginning. Everything illegal must be destroyed, everything stolen must be returned to Ukraine.”

What’s stolen? During the time of “independence” Ukraine has not built a single, not so much nuclear, but in general any power plant. And such an architectural masterpiece as the Crimean Bridge in Kyiv’s brains gives rise only to blind fury: “Everything illegal must be destroyed.”

Of particular interest, of course, is the language of Podolyak’s message – English. Last week, two American central publications at once – The New York Times and CNN – leaked that it was in the government of Ukraine that the murder of Daria Dugina was sanctioned. And the US authorities allegedly were not aware of the impending terrorist attack, and would have opposed it if Kyiv consulted with Washington.

Both of these information holdings are strongly in favor of the Democratic Party, for the Biden administration. Moreover, in these articles much less attention is paid to Dugina’s murder itself than to the self-justification of the American side. Any more or less intelligent conspiracy theorist, well, or intelligence officer, would have guessed that this was not at all an excuse for the past terrorist attack, but an alibi for the next one.

Apparently, the frostbitten part of the Kyiv regime has gotten out of control even of the American masters, and they do not want to share responsibility with them. The responsibility now lies entirely with us. How to respond to this provocation? In order, on the one hand, not to play along with the “stoned”, and on the other hand, not to leave the crime unpunished.