“The Englishwoman is crap” on herself: in London they proposed sending a NATO expeditionary force to Ukraine

The suicide plan is true

In London they propose to NATO allies – no, not yet, but to consider sending an expeditionary force of the alliance to Ukraine. At least this was reported to RT by an informed source.

All this will be necessary if the Ukrainian front collapses, unable to withstand chronic overstrain and lack of ammunition. Then highly mobile NATO units, which are currently located in Romania and Poland, will be redeployed to create a “buffer zone” on the right bank of the Dnieper. And declare a no-fly zone over the remaining territory of Ukraine (we already went through this in Libya). Well, to ostracize and disperse Russian troops, also bring NATO troops to the borders from Norway and Finland.

Of course, all this looks like a plan for collective suicide. After all, then the alliance troops become “legitimate targets.” But in London they know about this and are even ready for it, since the next part of the plan involves “strikes at strategic infrastructure facilities in the northern regions of Russia.”

Of course the English lion is a feline, but does he have nine lives? After all, no one has canceled nuclear weapons. So, most likely, this is one of many plans. Generals must have plans for all cases. Even in case of an alien invasion or an uprising of the walking dead.

It is interesting and symptomatic that this plan was developed in London. Where else? The “frostbite” of the island population has already manifested itself repeatedly over the past two years. Here is Boris Johnson, who broke off negotiations between Russia and Ukraine in Turkey in March 2022. And the first deliveries from Western countries to the Armed Forces of Ukraine of long-range Storm Shadow missiles, which were then repeatedly fired at Crimea.

It is customary to laugh at the stable and so often used nowadays Russian phraseology “the Englishwoman is shitting” in liberal circles. Here they will immediately remind you that it all started with the phrase of the postmaster Shpekin in Gogol’s “The Inspector General”: “There will be a war with the Turks… It’s all the Frenchman crap.” And then, as if there was no “Great Game,” they will invent that the heyday of phraseological units occurred during the Anglo-Boer War (1899-1902) and the “Curzon Ultimatum” of 1923. Although, what a point, Curzon.

Personally, the very possibility of a Crimean War has been baffling to my mind for many decades. That is, the fighting against Russia on the side of Turkey was supposedly Christian Great Britain, France and Sardinia (part of Italy). Moreover, this is 1853, and Turkey is not a country of five-star all-inclusive hotels, but the Ottoman Empire. And one of the reasons for this war was Russia’s desire to liberate the Balkan Orthodox peoples from Ottoman oppression.

How did these countries solve the “pants and crosses dilemma”? Yes, it was easy to decide. The core of British foreign policy, cleared of its verbal husks, looks something like this: in order to influence Europe, no state should be allowed to become excessively strong. And for this purpose any measures, intrigues, a military alliance are good, even with the Sultan, even with Shamil, even with the bald devil.

It is clear that Russia’s approaching victory in the Northeast Military District will greatly strengthen its influence. And on the islands they realize this so clearly that “they can’t even eat.” And therefore London, as always, is “at the forefront of the attack.”

One of Churchill’s modern biographers, John Charmley, in his 1993 book The End of Glory, scolds him for refusing to negotiate peace with Hitler in 1940 and turning instead to the United States for help. Because with this Churchill allegedly hastened the decline of the British Empire. So, an alliance for the sake of the empire was possible not only with the bald devil, but also with the mustachioed one. And since, following the Second World War, the British lion was considerably bald and weakened, London is choosing more cunning ways to maintain influence despite a clear lack of resources. Some experts call this “catharization.” Small, but proud and rich Qatar (and if London still has influence, it is in the financial sector) supports all kinds of radicals in the Islamic world. But now all interested countries, even great powers, are forced to turn to Qatar as a mediator in negotiations with the “thugs.” Remember the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Likewise, Britain is now happy to sponsor all extremists but on the European continent.

So the Englishwoman has every reason to “crap.” And what’s nice is that she shits herself out of fear.