Senators want to teach young people to recognize Western influence as early as possible
[ad_1]
On Monday, the Federation Council Commission for the Protection of State Sovereignty held a meeting dedicated to countering interference in Russia’s internal affairs “through youth policy.” The senators agreed that the younger generation needs a “vaccination” from foreign influence from a very young age. And the invited expert proposed creating a “register of negative phenomena” and including the defense of sovereignty in “children’s political education programs.”
In the course of attempts to interfere in the internal affairs of the Russian Federation, Western countries consider youth as a priority target, the head of the commission Andrei Klimov explained the topic of the meeting. “Even those under 14 years of age are being targeted,” he said indignantly: the work is carried out through “social networks, games and various contacts.” “When not very strong souls enter this network, it seems to them that they are alone, but they are not alone. Then development begins,” the senator warned. As an example, he cited young people who attacked military registration and enlistment offices. “Smart people are working against us. They understand that the vast majority of citizens trust their government, our national leader, and are ready to support him,” continued Mr. Klimov. “The hope of our enemies is that they will be able to play a destructive role in the subsequent period.”
Referring to the words of Vladimir Putin that citizens should feel “part of a big country” with its history and values from childhood, Andrei Klimov developed this idea even further: they should have a “vaccination” that will protect like an umbrella during rain. “A person must be so educated, prepared and convinced that this is (external influence.— “Kommersant”) will be in vain and extremely ineffective.”
The head of the scientific council of the Center for Current Political Affairs, Alexey Chesnakov, who spoke next, complained that too much responsibility in the field of youth policy lies with the state: “It would be nice, including at the legislative level, to fix the responsibility of society and the family.” For example, according to the political scientist, it is the parents who should ensure the protection of children from social networks and games, and the state should provide them with the tools. Developing this idea, he proposed creating a “public register of negative phenomena”—games, television programs, social networks, instant messengers—which would have an “explanatory function,” since “parents cannot always explain competently.”
Separately, Mr. Chesnakov focused on the election process, calling for attention not only to “voting” youth, but also to those who do not yet have passive voting rights: “It would be nice to include all issues related to the protection of sovereignty in children’s political programs.” education.” Since there is still no “targeted program” for such education in Russia, political consultants need to be involved in solving the problem, the expert suggested: “These should not just be teachers, but people deeply immersed in the issue, with knowledge of the tools of political pressure. Political scientists, relatively speaking, in an educational environment.”
Andrei Klimov agreed with the opinion about the responsibility of parents, stating that “without a family, it is very difficult to solve everything by law enforcement agencies or laws.” As an example, he cited the “propaganda of childlessness,” after which a philological discussion unexpectedly began between the participants in the meeting.
“Childfree,” Senator Lyubov Glebova corrected her colleague. “I specifically try to include the Russian language,” Mr. Klimov responded, “because even when discussing this, they always include Western narratives. Does this add scientificity or progressiveness?”
Mrs. Glebova responded by saying that this is an “artificial, uncharacteristic” phenomenon for our country, therefore, along with it, the term penetrates the language: “It’s for whom it is characteristic that the name is born. And then, along with the name, it comes to us…” “We don’t need…” Andrei Klimov tried to seize the initiative, but his colleague was more persistent. “We don’t need our name for their phenomenon! Let it, along with the name, die in our country!” — Lyubov Glebova summed up victoriously.
Other senators brought the conversation back to the main topic. Vladimir Poletaev stated that with the start of the special operation, the influence of “huge Western interference” began to fade: “When we work with fighters – these are also young people, born in the 1990s – we see how the paradigm is changing.” Eduard Isakov proposed more actively using patriotic themes when educating young people. “Today we are watching TV series that are educational for some reason. “And there are very few of them who would help attract more young people to volunteer organizations,” he was indignant. “We have our own television in every municipality, where is their government assignment?”
Mikhail Belousov developed this topic even more deeply, declaring the absence of “political support” in the cultural sphere. “I specifically went to one of the central bookstores to find something about SVO – nothing. We have not staged a single performance on the topic. (Although.- “Kommersant”) one hundred theaters in Moscow and the Moscow region,” the senator lamented. He also criticized the creators of the series “The Boy’s Word”which remind viewers how criminals “group” and “sort things out.”
“I would rather (film.— “Kommersant”) about those boys who fight and help in Lugansk or Donbass,” Mr. Belousov instructively added.
Finally, Lyubov Glebova stated that young people should have a “natural desire” to defend Russia’s sovereignty, and the “shaping of the head” begins very early. In this context, the senator recalled the dialogue between the head of the Ministry of Education, Sergei Kravtsov, and Vladimir Putin at a recent meeting of the supervisory board of the First Movement. Discussing the Russian Eaglets program for primary schools, the minister said that “it’s time for us to go to kindergarten.” To which the president replied that “we must begin as we were born,” Ms. Glebova recounted.
The discussion was summed up by Andrei Klimov, who said that this “serious strategic topic” will be included in the commission’s work plan for 2024, because without “a properly trained new generation of Russian citizens, it will be very difficult for us to move forward our distinctive Russian civilization.”
A parliamentary special group will be involved in the fight against foreign interference in the presidential elections
The State Duma will create a special monitoring group to monitor and suppress attempts by foreign interference in the presidential election campaign. This decision was made on December 11 at a meeting of members of the Duma commission to investigate the facts of interference of foreign states in the internal affairs of Russia with a member of the Central Election Commission (CEC) Igor Borisov. The group was headed by Deputy Chairman of the Commission Andrei Alshevskikh (United Russia).
The meeting participants agreed that “agents of influence” have already become more active. “The enemy views the election campaign as an opportunity to destabilize the situation in Russia, for example, by inciting ethnic hatred in national republics,” said the head of the commission, chairman of the Duma Security Committee Vasily Piskarev (United Russia). He shared data on “more than 100 media projects” controlled by control centers in the USA, Great Britain, Germany, Sweden, Poland and Ukraine, which are preparing Western audiences to recognize the presidential elections in Russia as illegitimate and “at the same time working out tasks to discredit our armed forces.” According to the deputy, “some relocants” also participate in this activity.
Igor Borisov, in turn, noted that the Central Election Commission also recorded “similar activity.” “Attempts to interfere in our elections will be made at all stages of the election campaign – during the period of nominating candidates, during the campaigning process and directly during voting,” believes a member of the Central Election Commission.
Let us recall that in the summer of 2021, a separate direction appeared in the activities of the Central Election Commission to counter foreign interference in Russian elections, which Igor Borisov was entrusted with overseeing. Then he emphasized that Russia became the first state where a specialized electoral organization began to substantively study the issue of foreign interference in elections. At the same time, Mr. Borisov was previously a member of monitoring groups that were created in the Duma to monitor foreign interference in elections.
[ad_2]
Source link
