Media: Washington is angry with London due to leaks of data on strikes on Yemen
[ad_1]
Telegraph: US angry at Britain over leaked data on strikes on Yemen
Washington was disappointed that the British authorities leaked information about the upcoming operation against the Houthis, The Telegraph writes.
The newspaper calls the current situation “a moment of tension.” Citing its sources, The Telegraph claims that the Pentagon declared “disappointment” with the actions of the British military.
At the same time, Britain is also concerned about the leak of data about plans to strike Yemen. Moreover, the British operation was not coordinated with the country’s parliament.
However, British Defense Minister Grant Shapps said that he was “not aware of any disappointment in Washington regarding the information leak.”
Earlier, the United States and Great Britain launched an operation against the Ansar Allah movement, carrying out airstrikes on targets in four provinces of Yemen. Yemen said 73 strikes were carried out, killing five fighters and wounding six more. The Houthi leadership reported attacks on American and British military bases and facilities, as well as the destruction of an American warship.
US President Joe Biden has announced new strikes against Houthi forces in Yemen if they continue attacks on merchant ships in the Red Sea. The owner of the White House, when talking to reporters, called the Houthis a terrorist group. The American leader also said that he had prepared a message for Iran, which, according to Washington, supports the Yemeni rebels. US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas-Greenfield said the strikes on Yemen were “out of necessity.” She said US and allied strikes in Yemen were “proportionate and consistent with international law.”
Russian Permanent Representative Vasily Nebenzya said that the strikes by the United States and its allies on Yemen violate Article 2 of the UN Charter. He accused Washington and its partners of helping the conflict spread throughout the region. He called such US actions arbitrary, noting that Washington calls them “effective diplomacy.”
[ad_2]
Source link
