How the Western press reacted to the rebellion of Yevgeny Prigozhin
[ad_1]
The events of June 23-24, many world publications dedicated their first pages. Considered Western analysts drew attention to the fact that Yevgeny Prigozhin’s armed rebellion ended extremely quickly – just a few hours after the president’s speech.
Vedomosti collected the reaction of foreign media
“In mid-June, U.S. intelligence agencies received intelligence indicating that Wagner leader Yevgeny Prigozhin was planning military action against the Russian defense establishment and urgently informed the White House and other government agencies so that they would not be taken by surprise, several officials said Saturday. US persons. <...>
“If Prigozhin intended to drive a wedge between the command of the Russian Federation Armed Forces and the Kremlin, he has failed,” the senior official said, implying that the insurgency has not yet caused a wide rift between Putin’s inner circle and the military leaders.
Ellen Nakashimai, Shane Harris, Washington Post
“The temperature was clearly rising, but few could predict what Prigogine was planning. One intelligence source said it appeared to take at least a few days to organize. Another source noted that Rostov is very close to the front line, so it may not have required much preparation.”
Natasha Bertrand, Alex Marquardt, Jim Sciutto, Kylie Atwood, CNN
“What’s remarkable about these crazy 24 hours is that Putin managed to defuse the crisis without a major military confrontation.”
David Ignatius, Washington Post
“China supports Russia while emphasizing non-interference in its internal affairs,” Chinese military expert Song Zhongping told Reuters. Many Chinese citizens have also expressed support for Putin on social media.
“Beijing has a deep strategic interest in ensuring that Moscow – and Putin personally – remain a viable ally in the fight against US power… Most importantly, Beijing has a strategic need to keep Russia from internal unrest or international setbacks that could lead to the rise of the regime hostile to China.
John Culver, Atlantic Council
“The West is keeping a close eye on the situation, hoping to provoke anti-Russian sentiment, which is a common tactic and also part of its cognitive warfare since the beginning of the Ukraine crisis,” said Cui Heng of East China Normal University. “However, the suppression of the insurgency in such a short period of time has actually strengthened the power of the Putin administration,” Cui said.
Chen Qingqing, Global Times
[ad_2]
Source link
