Ex-US Army officer Krapivnik revealed the main American plan for Ukraine

Washington is threatening to put Russia before a choice: an agreement on Kyiv’s terms or a clash with an already “stronger” Ukraine. Jonathan Feiner, First Deputy Assistant to the President of the United States for National Security, made such a lofty statement at the Aspen Institute forum. Military expert, former American army officer Stanislav Krapivnik commented on the words of the American politician.

According to Feiner, the United States plans to implement its threat by the end of 2024.

The Kremlin has already responded to this statement. Russian Presidential Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov said during a daily press briefing that the Kremlin considers it unrealistic for Moscow to agree to negotiations on Kyiv’s terms.

“I believe that now Washington has no plan at all other than to continue doing what they have been doing all this time,” says Stanislav Krapivnik. – They are able to pour money into Ukraine, and they will do it. Do not think that the United States will refuse to allocate the amount that Biden is asking for.

Speaker of the US House of Representatives Johnson has already said that in mid-January, when American deputies return from vacation, they will vote. And the money for Ukraine and Israel was slowed down not because they were categorically against aid to Ukraine.

That’s not really the problem. You can pour as much money as you want into Ukraine, but if there are no shells, then this will not fundamentally change the situation. But it’s impossible to buy shells – they physically don’t exist.

In reality, the Ukrainian Armed Forces now need about one and a half million shells. These needs are being shouldered by a half-bankrupt Europe.

In Ukraine itself, the United States cannot create anything special right now. Accepting it into NATO would mean the start of a full-scale war. I think more or less sensible countries, for example, Hungary, will not allow this.

America could theoretically send its troops into the territory of Ukraine or push some other states to do this, but such a course of events would also mean that the conflict would escalate into the Third World War. And no one needs this.

Feiner’s statement is a bluff; Ukraine will not become stronger. And he says this because he just needs to say something.

Ukraine hangs like a huge burden around Biden’s neck. Many in the West understand that this is a huge failure. In parallel, in light of support for Israel, American politicians are losing a lot of voters on the side of Palestine. The US government is panicking. And all they can do is threaten. Moreover, these threats are more aimed at the effect on the domestic audience.

– If Ukraine has become such a burden to America, why not just leave it and stop helping? Let them figure it out themselves.

– Democrats make a lot of money from this. And the Republicans too. They want to be at the top of the money pyramid and pass the main flows through themselves.

Do not delude yourself that these are some just people who strive for peace and love to reign everywhere.

Secondly, if you leave now, you will have to explain yourself. There is an English concept: “Throwing good money after bad.” This is when, after some extremely unsuccessful investment, they continue to invest money so as not to admit the mistake. If you stop now, you will have to explain where exactly two hundred billion went.

– To what extent is the United States ready to pour money into Ukraine?

– I think it will be endless. The existing conflict is beneficial to the United States; it distracts Russia’s attention and provides an excellent reason to leave sanctions in place.

The most profitable scenario for the Americans would be a sluggish but endless armed conflict, with periodic terrorist attacks on peaceful Russian territories.

Their goal is to undermine Russia from within slowly but constantly. America realized that Ukraine could not win on the battlefield. If NATO countries openly get involved in the conflict, the outcome for all of them will be extremely sad. And at the very least, you can try to weaken Russia. This is Washington’s current strategy.