Employees of the “Chained Duck” distance themselves from their management, accused of misuse of corporate assets
[ad_1]
“It’s not lacking in salt!” » Fourteen employees of chained duck undertook to undermine the version of the facts defended by their management, Wednesday, August 31, concerning the complaint for abuse of corporate assets and concealment of abuse of corporate assets which implicates it. As a reminder, the newspaper would have paid the companion of designer André Escaro after the latter decided, in 1996, to retire. To justify this use, the “board of directors” took the pen, in “one” of the edition of the day, to explain that“Edith” “read the press for him” and helped him “to find the trick that makes the salt” of the 8,000 designs created throughout these twenty-four years.
Obviously, the “writers, designers, sub-editors and proofreaders” at the origin of the press release (the insertion of their own text in the newspaper would have been refused to them) sent to the World and AFP do not wish to endorse a version of the facts which minimizes the abuses.
An “unknown” collaboration
“French social law does not provide for the remuneration of one employee in place of another”, they recall first. Further, they insist: “No, it’s not a ‘pair’ who drew every week in the newspaper! » Visibly with regret, they take ” good mark “ that their direction “continues to oscillate between the thesis of a real job as an assistant and the recognition of indirect remuneration from her husband”, while the vocabulary used (“support him by chewing on his work”, “read the press for him”…) seems to them “to smile”. The existence – and collaboration – of“Edith” was theirs “unknown”. Finally, hes regret that “the term ‘fault’, recognized by management during the August 29 editorial conference, does not appear, despite the stated intention” in the explanation published under the title “Reality exceeds fiction”.
Signed by the six administrators of the newspaper, this “advocacy pro domo” would in fact have been written by the only Michel Gaillard and Nicolas Brimo, respectively president of Editions Maréchal-Le Canard enchaîné and deputy general manager, assure the authors of the text, among which we find the dean Claude Angeli, the draftsmen (freelancers) Wozniak , Kerleroux, or even Pancho, the editors David Fontaine, Anne-Sophie Mercier, etc. Formulated against X, the complaint filed on May 10 by Christophe Nobili, an employee of the newspaper, implicitly targets the two men.
[ad_2]
Source link
