The 35 hours and the assistantship in the sights of the Republicans
[ad_1]
ANALYSIS – LR parliamentarians and their Centrist allies accept their differences over the RSA.
By opposing thework” at “assistantship” in the first parliamentary debates of the quinquennium, the Republicans deliberately chose to display a “marker penfrom the right. This assumed strategy has one objective: “Erase the deleterious consequences of the 35 hours“, as argued by Bruno Retailleau, president of the LR senators.
the purchasing power bill and the text on the amending budget will have been two opportunities for LR parliamentarians to convey this message in the public debate. Even if it means having to recognize the differences of analysis with their Centrist allies, who are also quick to display their “own markers“, as explained in Figaro Senator Hervé Marseille.
The gap between the LR and UC groups was clearly illustrated in the Senate on the question of the revaluation of the RSA. Right-wing senators stepped up alone on the subject, trying to correct the provisions of the text voted on at first reading in the Assembly. They offered to upgrade…
This article is for subscribers only. You have 81% left to discover.
Cultivating your freedom is cultivating your curiosity.
Subscription without commitment
Already subscribed?
Login
[ad_2]
Source link
