After Emmanuel Macron’s speech on education, a roadmap and many questions
[ad_1]
The format surprised, and the background too. Thursday August 25 in the morning, Emmanuel Macron opened, unprecedented, the back-to-school conference of academy rectors. In a speech broadcast on the Elysée’s social networks, the Head of State detailed the roadmap for the coming months and the ambitions for his second five-year term, drawing up an unflattering assessment of the state of the school system. .
He then set out the measures to be taken, before calling for the change of method announced before the summer, for a more flexible and less centralized management of the school system. In the educational community, the presidential speech was received with caution.
- The “great work” promised in the establishments, out of step with expectations
To describe this new operation based on the field proposal, the President of the Republic spoke of “great job” for “build a new project, school by school”. The projects decided by the educational teams will benefit from a “educational innovation fund” endowed with 500 million euros. But for the main stakeholders, the roadmap is not clear and seems out of step with the current crisis, that of the recruitment and purchasing power of teachers.
“If it’s about bringing parents of students and staff around a table, it’s called a board of directors and we know how to do it, notes Bruno Bobkiewicz, general secretary of the principals’ union SNPDEN-UNSA. On the other hand, the establishments will not want to organize things if they have the feeling that it will not work afterwards. » Emmanuel Macron insisted on the ” freedom “ educational teams whether or not to propose projects. For Bruno Bobkiewicz, making participation optional “is already a way of admitting that it’s not such a good idea”.
“The school does not need to launch projects, it needs resources”alarmed Guislaine David, of the SNUipp-FSU, while the Head of State assumed his conviction that the additional means would not solve the difficulties.
The idea of indexing funding to projects is also worrying: what about those who haven’t proposed anything, for lack of time or because part of the staff room opposes it? “We are going to spend three months debating so that at the end we are distributed tablets, because that is always how it ends”, annoys Jean-Rémi Girard, of the National Union of High Schools and Colleges (SNALC). “Let them put the 500 million euros in salary catch-up, it will go faster. »
You have 72.16% of this article left to read. The following is for subscribers only.
[ad_2]
Source link
