The oppositions refuse to play the game of the National Council for the Refoundation of Emmanuel Macron
[ad_1]
As often, Emmanuel Macron had used big words. The Head of State, re-elected a month earlier, tried, on June 2, in an interview with the regional daily press, to give impetus to his second term. At the heart of a legislative campaign from which he had seemed absent, the President of the Republic announced the creation of the National Refoundation Council (CNR), a tool aimed at reviving a sick democracy by bringing together the political, economic, social, associative forces, elected representatives of the territories and citizens drawn by lot. the ” wink “ the National Council of Resistance, set up during the Second World War to rebuild a bruised country, was assumed. “We are living in a similar time. We are in a historic era which requires a profound change of model and then, the war is there », explained the Head of State. The “new method” of a president accused of exercising power too vertically was taking shape.
But three months later, while the first meeting of the “CNR” is to be held on Thursday, September 8 in Marcoussis (Essonne), the Head of State is struggling to forge the spirit of harmony sought to appease a nation dominated by “quarrels and scandals”as he mentions in a column in the magazine Challenges dated August 24. Even before opening the first session of the CNR, where he must address the five chosen themes – ecology, education, employment, health and old age – Emmanuel Macron is struggling to convince.
Qualified for “ macronist contraption » by Bruno Retailleau, president of the Les Républicains (LR) group in the Senate, or of “blabla season 2” by the leader of La France insoumise (LFI), Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the CNR has already been boycotted by the opposition parties. From the LR to the National Rally (RN) via the Greens, the “rebellious”, the socialists and the communists, all have made it known that they should not participate in the discussions of the CNR, undoubtedly piloted by François Bayrou, boss of the MoDem, as secretary general, and where representatives of civil society must also take part.
“What’s the use of this stuff?” »
“The mechanisms of participatory democracy can contribute to enlightening national representation, but in no case can they replace it”has explained, in an interview at Figaro, on August 31, the President (LR) of the Senate, Gérard Larcher, who fears that the CNR is aiming to circumvent Parliament. “The CNR was never thought of as a substitute for Parliament. Bad politics to pretend not to understand it”annoyed on Twitter the Minister of the Public Service, Stanislas Guerini, denouncing the attitude “irresponsible” of the senator. “The range of oppositions is now widely represented in Parliament. What is the use of this thing? I do not see. Just because we’re going to meet there doesn’t mean we’ll find the philosopher’s stone.”supports Hervé Marseille, senator Union of Independent Democrats (UDI) of Hauts-de-Seine, who specifies that he was not invited on September 8.
You have 59.01% of this article left to read. The following is for subscribers only.
[ad_2]
Source link
