“Many will miss Dibrov”
[ad_1]
The resignation of Dmitry Dibrov from the post of host of “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?” came out noisy, and for someone scandalous. The participants in the events themselves preferred to do without unnecessary comments, but the people were not silent.
“And who now instead of Yakubovich? Claudia Koku? — commentators were indignant. Not a bad idea, by the way. And there is no doubt that the lively singer will cope with the wheel of fortune. Today’s starlets are generally very capable. Previously, the singer’s profession was classified as musical, now it’s just a way to become famous, and, as a rule, such girls do a good job with everything that is somehow connected with working for an audience. Music, cinema, theater, television – it’s not so important, the main thing is the prospect of becoming popular.
How does Yulianna Karaulova feel in Dibrov’s chair? Looks good. Of course, she doesn’t look like Dibrov at all. He was loved for his ability to show off his mind, and so far for her sweet smile and beautiful suit. But the very idea of replacing a strict uncle with a spectacular girl looks very advanced from all sides. The path of youth, a light feminist flair, well, and personnel diversity, not all artists and comedians can be used on television. You can also experiment for the sake of musicians.
Many, of course, will miss Dibrov. Over the decades of his television career, he has become one of the most famous TV presenters with some incredible recognition index. However, any TV permutations can be good reasons to decide why the audience likes the characters from the box. For the mind, appearance, timbre of voice, sense of humor? Probably for a little bit of everything, but the most truthful version seems to be that the audience just gets used to the presenters, and changing habits is not the most comfortable process.
The person in the frame becomes not only a part of our media landscape, but also practically an element of home decor. And now the vase, which has clearly taken root in your home, suddenly disappears. Now try to convince yourself that the world has not converged like a wedge on this vase, there will be another, which, perhaps, is not worse. However, you don’t even need to try, you yourself won’t notice how the “loss” will no longer be taken too seriously.
It is difficult to understand the Ostankino backstage with the mind, but with all the intrigues there, there is still a fairly high probability that your favorite TV presenter who has disappeared somewhere will suddenly return to your interior with a different program. Then check the sincerity of your feelings for him. Did you miss? Most likely not very much.
GARMASH VS MIKHAILOV
For lovers of decent star interviews, last week was a success. In the White Studio, Daria Zlatopolskaya had Sergey Garmash, and the Vernikov brothers had Alexander Mikhailov. Both actors give interviews infrequently.
In general, interviews are clearly not the most favorite genre for stars. Many of them still remember the robbers with television cameras, who, under the guise of some kind of documentary filmmakers, talked about high things for a long time, then asked a couple of secular questions and edited a yellow obscene story out of them. Now there are fewer yellow stories, but the risk of being declared almost an enemy of the people for a couple of harmless words has increased. All this makes celebrities cautious and make exceptions, except perhaps for interviewers with a reputation like Zlatopolskaya or Verniki.
The conversations with both Garmash and Mikhailov turned out to be very worthy. Both of them have something to tell and something to remember. True, their attitude to their own media is different. Garmash flashes not only in films, but also in commercials, Mikhailov is very careful with all this and, unlike many colleagues, managed to maintain some kind of mystery of a person of a creative profession.
As it turns out, this mystery is a serious capital. Every word uttered by such a person in the frame becomes quite weighty. Especially taking into account the fact that Mikhailov says not so much and exclusively on the case. Garmash also tells quite interesting things. Especially if you learn to ignore the fact that the man who broadcasts about Dostoevsky also offers you financial services.
Newspaper headline:
Dibrov gave way to youth
[ad_2]
Source link
